Historian's Take -- NRO
. . . That Wilentz’s book is explicitly an examination of the antislavery politics of Congress, which necessarily involved exploring “debates among white elites,” is never considered. Ultimately, Guyatt claims, Fredrick Douglass and others were “acting not as historians, but as activists” when they expressed an antislavery constitutionalism. “Wilentz, while approaching us as the former,” Guyatt laments, “is as much the latter as any of his subjects.”
Tuesday, August 27, 2019
Thursday, June 27, 2019
Friday, May 17, 2019
Monday, March 25, 2019
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Saturday, March 9, 2019
Thursday, March 7, 2019
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

